<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575476679976002386.post6270678867290151985..comments</id><updated>2008-10-24T15:40:24.790+02:00</updated><category term='Rx'/><category term='flash'/><category term='TemplateLibraryConnector'/><category term='ndc2010'/><category term='ilasm'/><category term='MSN'/><category term='tools'/><category term='il'/><category term='SharePoint'/><category term='boost'/><category term='synchronization'/><category term='best practices'/><category term='gadget'/><category term='ramblings'/><category term='SharePoint 2010'/><category term='c++09'/><category term='sidebar'/><category term='FireBug'/><category term='Ajax'/><category term='thunking'/><category term='Moles'/><category term='VS2008'/><category term='Greasemonkey'/><category term='asm'/><category term='c#'/><category term='jquery'/><category term='Bing'/><category term='PowerShell'/><category term='way off topic'/><category term='worst practices'/><category term='threadsynch'/><category term='VS2010'/><category term='disassembly'/><category term='architecture'/><category term='JavaScript'/><category term='XSS'/><category term='c++'/><category term='work'/><category term='ildasm'/><category term='vista'/><category term='json'/><category term='x64'/><category term='Silverlight'/><category term='.NET'/><title type='text'>Comments on Will Code for Nuts: Function static variables in multi-threaded enviro...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.codefornuts.com/feeds/6270678867290151985/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1575476679976002386/6270678867290151985/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.codefornuts.com/2006/11/function-static-variables-in-multi.html'/><author><name>Einar Otto Stangvik</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14646027402573050232</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2W8hERcZC84/TV74TcaWuKI/AAAAAAAAENQ/paeQgHgP3LI/s220/n657255700_818796_8968.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575476679976002386.post-7056720369273972450</id><published>2008-10-24T15:40:00.000+02:00</published><updated>2008-10-24T15:40:00.000+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Thread-local static variables implemented at the c...</title><content type='html'>Thread-local static variables implemented at the compiler level may actually be a better solution. The memory overhead is likely to be minimal, while the performance hit from interlocking could be very substantial.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1575476679976002386/6270678867290151985/comments/default/7056720369273972450'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1575476679976002386/6270678867290151985/comments/default/7056720369273972450'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.codefornuts.com/2006/11/function-static-variables-in-multi.html?showComment=1224855600000#c7056720369273972450' title=''/><author><name>Jerome</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.codefornuts.com/2006/11/function-static-variables-in-multi.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1575476679976002386.post-6270678867290151985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1575476679976002386/posts/default/6270678867290151985' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-433917280'/></entry></feed>
